Cases 31 - 40 of 12,100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abadie et al v. Daigle et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Justin Abadie and Rachel Abadie
Defendant:
Rodney Daigle, Jr and Chad Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. St. George et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Wells
Defendant:
St. George, Norman Browning and Chris Rials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Residential Acceptance Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Marcia Michelle Green
Defendant:
Residential Acceptance Corporation, Village Capital & Investments, LLC, DHI Title-Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Joseph v. Roszczvnialsk et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Joseph
Defendant:
Nicholas Roszczvnialsk, Sanford Ron and Kathryn E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray et al v. Leblanc et al
as 3:2024mc00070
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Correct Commissary, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ascension Properties, Inc. v. Livingston Parish Government
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ascension Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Livingston Parish Government
Petitioner:
Henry Hugh Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
