Cases 31 - 40 of 5,143
Joseph v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Joseph
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Internal Affairs and David Wade Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Lakyia T. Skinner
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Burl Cain, Eddie Veal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boykins v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Hanson Boykins
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Nunez
Defendant:
Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office, Calcasieu Parish Correctional Center, Riverbend Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. McKeithen et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Defendant:
Jack McKeithen, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nedd v. Bickham
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bryant Nedd
Defendant:
Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Wade
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Andrew Mitchell
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brewer v. Rosso
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Keith Brewer
Defendant:
Saundra Rosso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Defendant:
Earist D. Bickham, Nurse at DCI, Doctors at DCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
