Cases 21 - 30 of 3,195
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wade et al v. Greenville Police Department
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Eric Wade and Yvette Toy
Defendant:
Greenville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Humphreys County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Cordney Williams and David James
Defendant:
Humphreys County Sheriff's Department, Humphreys County Board of Supervisors and Humphreys County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fischer v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fischer
Defendant:
Trooper Jason Young and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aiken v. Bell et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron Aiken
Defendant:
Trooper Cameron Bell and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Marcum v. Lewis
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Alex Marcum
Defendant:
Lincoln Steven Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
