Cases 41 - 50 of 3,760
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Lee Co. Sheriff Dept.
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Michael Cox
Respondent:
Lee Co. Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. USA
as 3:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Kelson Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Durdin v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Michael Durdin
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Hughes
as 1:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Matthew Cunningham
Respondent:
Langford Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
South v. MDOC
as 4:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Bradley South
Defendant:
MDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. MSP Parchman State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Samuel Young
Defendant:
MSP Parchman State Prison, Delon Douglas, Stephan Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v MSP Parchman et al
as 4:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Samuel Young
Defendant:
MSP Parchman State Prison, Kameron Woodard and Major Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Pontotoc MS Police Dept et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Nakita Donita Long
Defendant:
Pontotoc MS Police Dept, Captain Mark Baldwin, Matthew Pannell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Prentiss County et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Mike Rutledge
Respondent:
Prentiss County and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
