Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,567
Prosser v. SSM Health Insurance Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00279
Plaintiff: Christopher Prosser
Defendant: SSM Health Insurance Company, Inc. and John and Jane Does (1-18)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Paulsen v. CMRE Financial Services, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Michelle Paulsen
Defendant: CMRE Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01715
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Human v. Dream Style Remodeling of Idaho, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Defendant: Dream Style Remodeling of Idaho, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01731
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Griffin v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2023cv01619
Plaintiff: Gregory Lee Griffin
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Human v. Anderson Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Defendant: Anderson Corporation doing business as Renewal by Anderson and John and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Prosser v. Jerry Offers, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff: Christopher Prosser
Defendant: Jerry Offers Inc. and Gainsco Auto Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01576
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?