Cases 81 - 90 of 187
Trust v. St. Louis Housing Authority et al
as 4:2013cv01686
Defendant:
St. Louis Housing Authority and Cheryl A. Lovell
Plaintiff:
Sharnae Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. City of St. Peters
as 4:2013cv01493
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of St. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Powell v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2013cv00759
Plaintiff:
Telester Ameena Powell
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Noskov v. Fairway Management, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01440
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Noskov
Defendant:
Fairway Management, Inc. and Bear Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Rolf v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamar Rolf, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Social Services and Jackson County Family Services Division
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Gaylor v. GS Brentwood LLC
as 4:2011cv00506
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Defendant:
GS Brentwood LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Miller v. Morris Corners, LLC
as 6:2011cv03514
Defendant:
Morris Corners, LLC and Sansone Group/DDR, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gaylor v. Southtown Realty LLC
as 4:2011cv00514
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Defendant:
Southtown Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hoskin v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 4:2012cv01795
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hoskin
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01409
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc. , Citibank N.A. , CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Walter F. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
