Cases 31 - 40 of 578
Smith v. Dade County, Missouri et al
as 6:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Linda Renee Smith
Defendant:
Dade County, Missouri, Kim Kinder, Jake O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Peterson v. Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Danielle Peterson
Defendant:
Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Krtek v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 5:2023cv06021
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Krtek
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shook v. The City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Donnie Shook
Defendant:
The City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martin v. Southwest Baptist University
as 6:2022cv03313
Plaintiff:
Casey Martin
Defendant:
Southwest Baptist University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jimenez v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jimenez
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Farah v. Logisticare Solutions, LLC.
as 4:2020cv00578
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Farah
Defendant:
Logisticare, Inc. and Logisticare Solutions, LLC
Knox et al v. Me 2 You Academy of Phlebotomy LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Myonia Knox, Jasmine Lyman and J'Mil Jackson
Defendant:
Me 2 You Academy of Phlebotomy LLC and Examinetics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alvarez et al v. Cake 5332, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Rosangelica Alvarez and Shahram Shahandeh
Defendant:
Cake 5332, LLC and Abdul Hamideh
Hunsaker v. Custom Wood Products, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Rickey Hunsaker and Daryl Patton
Defendant:
Custom Wood Products, Inc. and Custom Wood Products, Inc. doing business as Profile Cabinet & Design
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Failure to Pay Earned Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
