Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,424
San Paolo v. USA
as 6:2024cv03096
Petitioner: Joseph San Paolo
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McIlvoy v. Centurion Medical, et al
as 2:2024cv04025
Plaintiff: Terry L. McIlvoy
Defendant: Centurion Medical and Dr. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Stange
as 6:2024cv03101
Petitioner: Jordan Bush
Respondent: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff: DaRon Clay
Defendant: Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arita v. USA
as 4:2024cv00249
Petitioner: Yader J Arita
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner: Calvin Hutson
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Centurion LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06048
Plaintiff: Zachary D Lee
Defendant: Centurion LLC, WRDCC Medical Staff, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant: State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00237
Petitioner: Preston Moore
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nutall v. Page
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner: Willie James Nutall
Respondent: Justine Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?