Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,616
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff: Tekeva Shaw
Defendant: Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff: Tekeva Shaw
Defendant: Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Raymond's Auto Repair
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff: Tekeva Shaw
Defendant: Raymond's Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff: Herman Phillips
Defendant: Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02258
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02248
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02250
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?