Cases 11 - 20 of 7,254
Hill v. Rausch
as 2:2024cv02228
Plaintiff:
Michelle P. Hill
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02229
Petitioner:
Patrick Talley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McKinney v. Tearson
as 2:2024cv02125
Petitioner:
Jason McKinney
Respondent:
Bruce Tearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. Fields
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
K. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Obion County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Carale Shields
Respondent:
Obion County, Tennessee and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hester v. Chester County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Michael Hester
Defendant:
Chester County, Tennessee, Blair Weaver, Mark Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant:
Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolley v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Eric Tolley
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, FNU Harris, Jeremy Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakeley v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv02215
Petitioner:
Michael David Blakeley
Respondent:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
