Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,576
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff: John Doe #066
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Helton v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff: Ricky M. Helton
Defendant: Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kelly v. Advance Financial et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: Henderson Kelly, Jr.
Defendant: Advance Financial and Wendy's of Bowling Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #045 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: John Doe #045
Defendant: William Lee, David Rausch and Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King et al v. Quad-R, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Dillon King and Allison King
Defendant: Quad-R, Inc. doing business as Rae Products Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?