Cases 111 - 120 of 4,788
Bailey v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Earsel Delano Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Sheriff Steve Reams and Sheriff f/n/u Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ross v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02576
Petitioner:
Richard L Ross
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Shelby Fiduciary Sale Force of Shelby County Jail
as 2:2023cv02621
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
Shelby Fiduciary Sale Force of Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
Dustin Shawn Price
Respondent:
Warden Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00919
Petitioner:
Jamarces J. Watson
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickman v. Wardlow
as 2:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Rickey A Hickman
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01231
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halstead v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02606
Petitioner:
Michael Halstead
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinton v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02548
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
