Cases 131 - 140 of 2,002
Abston v. Khairollahi et al
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Abston
Defendant:
MD Vali Khairollahi, Rachel Moore, Officer Purdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Cline et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Defendant:
John Doe, Caleigh Cline, Brandon Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pride v. Turner et al
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Cornellius Darell Pride
Defendant:
Kevin Turner and Brittany Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tankesly v. TN Department of Corrections et al (PSLC1)
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Calvin-Otis Tankesly, Jr.
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Does
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moses
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Criss et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael R Smith
Defendant:
Nurse Criss, B Oham and Knox County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayfield v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Rayfield
Defendant:
Sgt Young, Officer Fink and Officer Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brant v. Tresslor et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Amber K Brant
Defendant:
Clifford Tresslor, Sgt. Odom, Sgt. Mulvane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. BCCX et al
as 4:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunt
Defendant:
BCCX, Aramart Food Services, TDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turnbill v. Anderson County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Anthony Turnbill
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Facility and Deputy Fultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
