Cases 81 - 90 of 7,258
Taylor v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curtis Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, Purtle, Olsburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Cameron Chrishun Brooks, Sr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Shelby County Jail, Sgt. Mourning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pirtle v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2023cv02811
Plaintiff:
Arthur Pirtle
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kwaning v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02002
Petitioner:
Mohammed Asamoah Kwaning
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oruade v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02023
Petitioner:
Caesar Oruade
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meehan v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02110
Petitioner:
Shaun Meehan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hardy v. Whiteville Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hardy
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamblin v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamblin
Defendant:
Anthony Alexander, Mr. Doctor Morton, Erica N. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. WellPath et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Darrington R. Chatman
Defendant:
WellPath, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Wilson/Massigale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Pierre M. Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
