Cases 71 - 80 of 12,470
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Victor Tuli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, Supreme Court United States and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05243
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez v. USA
as 1:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Elias Mendez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2024cv05024
Petitioner:
Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
