Cases 1 - 10 of 5,580
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. Schelp
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. TMX Finance, LLC
as 4:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
TMX Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 4:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. OneMain Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
State of Arkansas et al v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
The State of Arkansas, The State of Missouri, The State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, Catherine E. Lhamon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Human v. EZ Insurance Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
EZ Insurance Solutions, LLC and John and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perimeter Solutions LP v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Perimeter Solutions LP
Defendant:
Thomas Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
