Cases 21 - 30 of 5,195
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Cogent, Inc. v. Myers
as 5:2024cv06041
Plaintiff:
Cogent, Inc. doing business as Cogent Companies
Defendant:
Adam Kurt Myers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
H&R Block Inc. et al v. Himes et al
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
H&R Block Inc., HRB Digital LLC and HRB Tax Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay L. Himes, Lina M. Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Morris
as 6:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kendell Morris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
