Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,195
2024 ATTORNEY REINSTATEMENTS
as 2:2024mc09998
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Larmore et al
as 4:2023mc09009
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Receiver: Allen D. Applbaum
Defendant: Jonathan Larmore, ArciTerra Companies, LLC, ArciTerra Note Advisors II, LLC and others
Type: Other Statutes zero
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00945
Plaintiff: Daniel Umpa
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. SGDS Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2023cv04236
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: SGDS Enterprises, LLC doing business as Advantage Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
USA v. Lugo
as 6:2023cv03391
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Nestor Lugo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00941
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Edwards
as 6:2023cv03388
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Samuel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Walters
as 6:2023cv03389
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Quenell Walters
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Hanson v. Reliance Litigation, LLC
as 4:2023cv00934
Plaintiff: Jon C. Hanson
Defendant: Reliance Litigation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?