Cases 41 - 50 of 4,823
T.F. v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
T.F.
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle S.A., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Malcolm v. Wardrip et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Felicia Malcolm
Defendant:
Junior Wardrip and VRC Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ramirez v. Menard Inc.
as 2:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Angela Ramirez
Defendant:
Menard Inc. doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Glasscock v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Harper Glasscock
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Infinity Ward, Inc., Sledgehammer Games, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sharp v. Agape Baptist Church Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sharp
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School and Bryan Clemensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 6:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ellis v. Brummett et al
as 2:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Ellis
Defendant:
Drury Brummett and Lupus Superior, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Glidewell v. Callan et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kim M. Glidewell
Defendant:
Dakota D. Callan, SS Sarge Farms, LLC, Does I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Meckem v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 6:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Diana Meckem
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
