Cases 31 - 40 of 20,714
Dorsey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Eric B. Dorsey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Loreen Armstrong, Unknown Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Vandergriff et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Robbie Robertson
Defendant:
Teri Vandergriff, Co. Unknown Aubuchon and Co. Unknown Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. City of Bridgton MO. et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Bynum
Defendant:
City of Bridgton MO. and St. Louis County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuget v. USA
as 4:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
Justin Fuget
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leist v. Griffin et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Zachery Leist
Defendant:
Tyler Griffin, C. James and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. USA
as 3:2024cv05028
Petitioner:
Jason C. Russell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
