Cases 1 - 10 of 44,337
North Kansas City Destination Developers, LLC v. City of North Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
North Kansas City Destination Developers, LLC
Defendant:
City of North Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Great Southern Bank v. Fiserv Solutions, LLC
as 6:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Great Southern Bank
Defendant:
Fiserv Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Potts v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Shalisha Potts
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Reavis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Richard Reavis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Amanda Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stone v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Stone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company v. The Pony MO LLC et al
as 6:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Pony MO LLC doing business as Rumors Cabaret Springfield, Pamela Middleton, P.B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
