Cases 11 - 20 of 19,585
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERK v. ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv05581
Plaintiff:
JESSICA NAN BERK
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY and NEW JERSEY GAMING ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05571
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ALL BIDEN CABINET MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
