Cases 21 - 30 of 18,914
Arcona v. Camden County Drug Court et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05635
Petitioner:
EFRAIN VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEVIVO v. FRANCESCHINNI
as 1:2024cv05639
Petitioner:
LISA A. DEVIVO
Respondent:
REBECCA FRANCESCHINNI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WICK v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05632
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. WICK
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLOCKER v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv05500
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
CHERYL LNU, KELLY WARDER and CAPTAIN MADLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMENAMIN v. SPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv05538
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SPIRO, SERGEANT SLOAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05590
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MITROS v. CASTILLO/MARR et al
as 1:2024cv05420
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
MELISSA CASTILLO/MARR, A. M. and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE BUENA BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
