Cases 51 - 60 of 18,897
MARSHALL v. PATTERSON
as 1:2024cv04516
Plaintiff:
KYWAN MARSHALL and JADIS VALENTINE
Defendant:
ROBERT PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GARRETT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv04598
Plaintiff:
JACOB TIMOTHY GARRETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS N.J.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUZO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04545
Petitioner:
CARLOS SAUZO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POSSO v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv04555
Petitioner:
28235-078 DAYRUN ALBORNOZ POSSO
Respondent:
WARDEN and FCI, FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RONEY v. SGT. VLEZ et al
as 2:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
RASHAD RONEY and RAHSHAD RONEY
Defendant:
SGT. VLEZ, NORTHERN STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWER v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv04342
Petitioner:
BRAZHON LEWER
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and UNION COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPINNER v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
JULIUS SPINNER
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, DIRECTOR OF NURSES MAXIM CASAS, NURSE WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALEJO v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04421
Petitioner:
CARLOS VALEJO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WHITFIELD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04422
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD
Respondent:
WARDEN RENEE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
