Cases 51 - 60 of 2,010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Cram et al v. State of Oregon, Department of Human Services (DHS) et al
as 6:2008cv06365
Plaintiff:
Robert Cram, Sarah Cram, M.R. and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Department of Human Services (DHS), Linn County Sheriff, Linn County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Yeo v. Washington County et al
as 3:2008cv01317
Plaintiff:
Ken Yeo and Ken Yeo
Defendant:
Washington County and Multnomah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv01315
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Alberto Gonzales, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. Yankey et al
as 3:2008cv01311
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnston
Defendant:
John Yankey, City of Portland, Multnomah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Boczki et al v. City of Portland
as 3:2008cv01310
Plaintiff:
Joseph Boczki and Elizabeth Boczki
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
