Cases 91 - 100 of 6,301
Wilson v. Scott County
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Eric Wilson
Respondent:
Scott County
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Eller et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Tucker
Defendant:
Warden Eller, Unit Manager Cox, Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johns v. USA
as 4:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Josh Johns
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Denton v. Brun
as 3:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Robert Seth Denton
Respondent:
Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tubbs-Chandler v. Gallion et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Tubbs-Chandler
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Brun
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Orlando Malone
Respondent:
Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carmody v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024mc00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Carmody
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hitchcock v. USA
as 2:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Tyrone Lamas Hitchcock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clark v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
James W. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Gregory Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Dalmar Mack
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Gregory Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
