Cases 31 - 40 of 24,480
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Silverdale Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Marquest Woods
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nwokoro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02246
Petitioner:
Uwanbunkonye Nwokoro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00481
Petitioner:
Randall Parker
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02242
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Silverdale Detention Center
as 1:2024mc00013
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Marquest Woods
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarvin et al v. Cobble et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Tarvin and Annie Barnes
Defendant:
Brett Cobble and f/n/u Higdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
