Cases 41 - 50 of 7,258
Sayyed v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02083
Petitioner:
Aziz Ihab Sayyed and Azia Ihab Sayyed
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dimmett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02062
Petitioner:
Cody Dimmett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nelson v. Watwood
as 1:2024cv01068
Petitioner:
Antonio Nelson
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keymon et al v. Kearcey et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kyle Wayne Keymon and James Allen Franks
Defendant:
Nathan Kearcey, Emma Gray, Amanda Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driskell v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Driskell
Defendant:
Arkeycia Baker, Endrea Howard and Kathy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryans v. Shelby County Sherrifs Jail Division et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Suamark D. Ryans
Defendant:
Shelby County Sherrifs Jail Division and City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Ortega v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02185
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Ortega
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Settle v. Vantell
as 1:2024cv01060
Petitioner:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Payne v. Whisman et al
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Cesare Payne
Defendant:
Candace Whisman, Camala Morris, Wendy Pruett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clum v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
David Clum, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
