Cases 71 - 80 of 2,180
Cox v. State of Tennessee 30th Judicial At Memphis
as 2:2023cv02497
Petitioner:
Clifton J. Cox
Respondent:
State of Tennessee 30th Judicial At Memphis and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02496
Petitioner:
Glenn Thomas Collins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Britt
as 2:2023cv02450
Defendant:
Murdock Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Somerville v. Holloway
as 2:2023cv02445
Petitioner:
Jesse J. Somerville
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. Scott, et al
as 1:2023cv01145
Petitioner:
Dameion Buckley
Respondent:
Angela Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02443
Petitioner:
Jermaine Hill
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and United State Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Parris
as 1:2023cv01142
Petitioner:
Corbyn D. Davis
Respondent:
Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Leeds
as 2:2023cv02416
Petitioner:
Antonio Allen
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
