District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 31 - 40 of 90,253
White v. Pilkington et al
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
John Bradley White
Defendant:
Cheri Pilkington, Christie Edwards, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America v. Thomason Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Defendant:
Thomason Group, Inc. and Juanita Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Marcinak v. Steber, III
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Judith S Marcinak
Defendant:
William E. Steber, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, Alabama DHR, Barbour DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece and Sheriff Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
