US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ortiz v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Joseph Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 3:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
Office of George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kendall Bowen
Defendant:
Deputy Billy Davis, D. Williams, Lt. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. USA
as 2:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
Leonard Tromell Brooks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Scott v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Waytayha Scott
Respondent:
Tikki M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. United States
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. GRTC of Richmond Virginia
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
GRTC of Richmond Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
