Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,633
Proctor v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv40171
Plaintiff:
Ira W Proctor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fernandes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv12873
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Fernandes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Collins Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv12847
Plaintiff:
Coleene Collins Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pedlow v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv12838
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pedlow
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Buffum v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv12814
Plaintiff:
Hannah R. Buffum
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Krockta v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv12812
Plaintiff:
Heidi Higgins Krockta
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martinez Arocho v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv30123
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Martinez Arocho
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Garner v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv12739
Plaintiff:
Keisha Garner
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rosa v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2023cv12694
Plaintiff:
Gricely Rosa
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Dennis W Ranker
Walsh v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv40154
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Walsh, Jr.
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
