U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,044
Konecny v. U.S. Small Business Administration, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ISABEL GUZMAN, LORAINE BURTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Konecny v. Boulder Community Health, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH, ROBERT VISSERS, JASON ROZESKI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Twin Star Energy v. Board of Adjustment, et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff:
TWIN STAR ENERGY, LLLC, a Colorado limited liability company
Defendant:
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES, STATE OF COLORADO, a body corporate and public, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES, STATE OF COLORADO, a body corporate and public, CITY OF CASTLE PINES IN DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, a municipal corporation and others
White v. Lucero, et al
as 24-2035
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON WHITE
Defendant:
ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, New Mexico Corrections Department, in her individual capacity, JOE LYTLE, New Mexico Corrections Department, in his individual capacity, MELISSA ORTIZ, New Mexico Corrections Department, in her individual capacity and others
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bloomquist v. State of Utah, et al
as 24-4022
Plaintiff:
DARRELL C. BLOOMQUIST
Defendant:
STATE OF UTAH, LEONARD ISAACSON, MARK WATKINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
