Tenth Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,642
Fuller et al v. Jefferson County, Colorado
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ANN PARADY, LAURA M. HODGSON, ROCHELLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 47101 - Airport & Airway Improvement Act
Holman et al v. Future Growth, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Holman and Marcella Warner Holman
Defendant:
Future Growth, LLC, STUGA, LLC, High Plains Title, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Defendant:
Scotty Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Shaoul (PS) v. Angelucci
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jack Shaoul
Defendant:
Charles Angelucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Real Property
Magnolia Acres LLC v. Bolkema et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Magnolia Acres LLC
Defendant:
Calvin Dean Bolkema and Brenda Kay Bolkema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Nixon v. Woodman of the World, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
TRACY NIXON
Defendant:
WOODMAN OF THE WORLD, ASSURED LIFE ASSOCIATION, RICKEY B. FERGUSON and others
Linlor v. Holman et al
as 6:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
James Linlor
Defendant:
John Holman, Marcella Warner Holman, Black Diamond Angus Ranch Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Googins v. CF&I Steel, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv03241
Plaintiff:
Lowell F Googins
Defendant:
CF&I Steel, L.P. and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Dulaney v. City of Broken Arrow
as 4:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Randy Dulaney
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
