Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 42,029
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Bethea v. City of Tulsa Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ralph C Bethea
Defendant:
City of Tulsa Oklahoma, The, City of Tulsa Attorney General, The, State of Oklahoma, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant:
DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
McDonald v. Kansas, State of et al
as 6:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald and Michael Wayne McDonald
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Georgia, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Morris
as 1:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Allen Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Owners et al
as 1:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Owners, Andraya Michelle, Pretty Little Thing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
