Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 42,033
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant:
DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
McDonald v. Kansas, State of et al
as 6:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald and Michael Wayne McDonald
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Georgia, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Morris
as 1:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Allen Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Owners et al
as 1:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Owners, Andraya Michelle, Pretty Little Thing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Flemons (PS) v. Paramount Pictures Streaming et al
as 1:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Streaming and Brian Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tedeschi (PS) v. Hartford Insurance, The et al
as 1:2024cv01266
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Tedeschi
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance, The and Georgi Tedeski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garneau v. Children's Hospital et al
as 5:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Rodney R Garneau
Defendant:
Children's Hospital, Myka Oberlechner, Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Flemons (PS) v. Federal Govt
as 1:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Federal Govt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
