Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 49,445
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Gallegos (PS) v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Raul Gallegos
Defendant:
Jordan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Pittman et al
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Pittman, White and Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections Prison Officers et al
as 1:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Jared Lee Chavez
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections Prison Officers, Grill, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oropeza v. 3rd Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Oscar Oropeza
Defendant:
3rd Judicial District Court and State Of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Wilken et al
as 1:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Christopher E Murray
Defendant:
FNU Wilken, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobos v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Danny S Cobos
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Justin Dominguez
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaramillo v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Jaramillo
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
