District Court Cases in Kansas
Cases 51 - 60 of 31,347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lewis (ID 107555) v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
(fnu) Smith and Jennell L. Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Malcolm Drilling Company, Inc. v. Lane Construction Corporation, The et al
as 2:2024cv02133
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Drilling Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Lane Construction Corporation, The, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Everest Reinsurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Sullivan v. Walmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv04026
Plaintiff:
Clarence Sullivan
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Divot Board, LLC v. Golf Technologies, LLC
as 2:2024cv02135
Plaintiff:
Divot Board, LLC
Defendant:
Golf Technologies, LLC doing business as Birdie Bath
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
