Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 37,035
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturkey v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, FNU LNU and Cruz LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Shaffer
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Pinellas County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Robert Abraham Clark
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff Department, Pinellas County Jail Medical Staff, Unknown Medical Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Solomon Roberts
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Emily Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuminotto v. Dixon et al
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Leonard Cuminotto
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon and Sergeant Ryan Doll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Miles v. Cash America Pawn Shop, et al
as 24-11321
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant:
CASH AMERICA PAWN SHOP and TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
