Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,746
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Williams
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Corrections and Phillips State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mastella-Ellen v. Robertson et al
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Mastella-Ellen
Defendant:
Sheriff Dane Robertson, Mayor Allen Pledger and Bob Covey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iacono v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Aca Daniel Iacono
Defendant:
Captain Danny Woods and Sargent Jenifer Kost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
