Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,498
Nunley v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nunley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCaa v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Cedriquez McCaa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Daniel v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Michael Javon Daniel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kitt v. USA
as 1:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
Derric Shermaine Kitt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Estrada v. USA
as 1:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Estrada, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lee v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08018
Petitioner:
Mario Anton Lee
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doak v. USA
as 1:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Mack Doak
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08020
Petitioner:
Jemarkus Vonsha Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stamps v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Tario Stamps
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Quinton Martez Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
