US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 16,835
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant:
Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bey v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Damar Bey
Defendant:
Brittany Quiera Austin and Anita L Dowdell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Petro v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kristen Justice Petro
Defendant:
Justin Bohannon, John Doe Holbrooks and Image Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
