Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 13,742
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BRODRICK M WALKER
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and ANTONIE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Gordon County Jail
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Dwight Dwayne Curtis
Defendant:
Gordon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townes v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Darian Townes
Defendant:
Heather Davis and Warden/C-T Valdosta State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Gordon County Jail
as 4:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dwight Dwayne Curtis
Defendant:
Gordon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yun v. Minton et al
as 1:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Alex Yun
Defendant:
Captain Minton, Officer Phillips, Walton Co. Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Erick Dawayne Bowman
Defendant:
Medical Nurse Dr. Jones, Willie Wilson and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. Babb et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Todd Andrew
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry H. Babb and Fayette County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
