Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 39,592
HAMMOND v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
MARQUEZ HAMMOND
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kengne v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kengne v. The Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01992
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
The Fulton County Jail and Sheriff Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Demari D. Lee
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young and Naylor Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
Spencer R. Moore and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Williams
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Corrections and Phillips State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lora v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Jose Lora
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
