Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 18,831
Young v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Patrick Young
Respondent:
Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Awuley v. Searls
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner:
Prince Awuley
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phelps v. McCarthy
as 1:2024cv02381
Petitioner:
Darryl Phelps
Respondent:
Superintendent K. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02280
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Murray Hall, III
Respondent:
NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. State of New York DOCCS Board of Parole Counselor's Office
as 9:2024cv00399
Petitioner:
William Michael Hall
Respondent:
State of New York DOCCS Board of Parole Counselor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahaman v. Bennett
as 9:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Cendno Rahaman
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center
as 1:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Respondent:
Onondaga County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
