Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 18,831
Hatley v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Stephanie Ann Hatley
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bortner v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
Barbara Bortner
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Silva v. Commissioner of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Cordaryl D Silva
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheeler v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv01910
Petitioner:
Damon Wheeler
Respondent:
R. Maldonado, Warden and U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burke v. Deml
as 2:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
James T. Burke
Respondent:
Nick Deml
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center
as 9:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Respondent:
Onondaga County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ewers v. Royce
as 2:2024cv01865
Petitioner:
Deon Ewers
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riley v. OMH Commissioner of New York State Office of Mental Health
as 1:2024cv01663
Plaintiff:
Christopher Riley
Defendant:
OMH Commissioner of New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
