Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,409
Cruz-Robles v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00755
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Cruz-Robles
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Myers v. Connecticut Commission of Correction
as 3:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Michael Myers
Respondent:
Connecticut Commission of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaddy v. State of New Hampshire Hospital
as 3:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Kaddy
Respondent:
State of New Hampshire Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flete-Garcia v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00746
Petitioner:
Furvio Flete-Garcia
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzalez v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00749
Petitioner:
Cecilio Gonzalez
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Thibeault et al
as 3:2023cv00742
Petitioner:
Kenneth Brown
Respondent:
Thibeault and Mu'min
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dull v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00736
Petitioner:
Nathan Gene Dull
Respondent:
Cheshire Correctional Institute and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laugel v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Richard Laugel
Respondent:
J. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carpenter v. Sitek
as 3:2023cv00719
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent:
Jonathan Sitek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prestes v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00694
Petitioner:
Joao Djalma Prestes
Respondent:
J. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
