Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,409
Crump v. Guadarrama
as 3:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Durosola Crump
Respondent:
Guadarrama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamoureaux v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Lamoureaux
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bronfman v. Pullen et al
as 3:2023cv00619
Petitioner:
Clare Bronfman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bryan Antonelli and others
Defendant:
Richard Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bronfman
as 3:2023cv00617
Petitioner:
Clare Bronfman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carzoglio v. Corradino
as 3:2023cv00614
Petitioner:
Angelo Carzoglio
Respondent:
Joseph T. Corradino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kaddy v. State of New Hampshire Hospital
as 3:2023cv00618
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Kaddy
Respondent:
State of New Hampshire Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nygren v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00597
Petitioner:
Steven Nygren
Respondent:
J. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
Troy Jones
Defendant:
J. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fulcher v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Jahmal Fulcher
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pujols v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00564
Petitioner:
Jose Ernesto Pujols
Respondent:
Nash
Defendant:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
