Third Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Cecelia Taransky v. Secretary Department of Heath, et al
as 13-3483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECELIA A. TARANSKY, Indivudally and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Stark v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv02317
Plaintiff:
Maygion Stark
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maellaro v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv01560
Plaintiff:
John R. Maellaro
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TARANSKY v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2012cv04437
Plaintiff:
CECELIA A. TARANSKY
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PERESOLAK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2012cv00921
Plaintiff:
ANN MARIE PERESOLAK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
BRYAN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
LINDA J. BRYAN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
James Sebastian v. Secretary U.S. Dept of Health
as 11-2136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. SEBASTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY U.S. DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVS
VESSIO v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES
as 3:2011cv00991
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C. VESSIO
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
REICHE v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv01519
Plaintiff:
ERIC C. REICHE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UROHEALTHCARE, LLC v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
UROHEALTHCARE, LLC
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
