Third Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 78
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC. v. UNITES STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01082
Petitioner:
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00942
Petitioner:
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
USA v. Eli Chabot, et al
as 16-3873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELI CHABOT
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE CHABOT
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2016mc00165
Petitioner:
Jerry V. Smith
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
In re: Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
Jerry V. Smith
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Fraser v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FRASER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gandrup v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015mc00287
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP v. THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS et al
as 2:2015cv04700
Plaintiff:
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS , THE VIRGIN ISLANDS BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Gandrup v. United State of America, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015mc00038
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United State of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv07365
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
